After Dark in Playing Fields, #1
Posted in Uncategorized on 08/09/2009 11:32 am by GlenOr, what Glen’s been up to when the writing on the new novel and the new stories is done and the kids are abed.
This is the first in what will, I hope, become a regular feature on this irregular blog. It’s also a chance to unpack and retool ye olde critic chops, which I haven’t made proper use of since I stopped contributing regularly to L.A. Weekly to concentrate on fiction and parenting.
Mostly, it’s me at play, talking about things I like talking about, and actually do talk about much more than the tedium of surviving the writing life. Feel free to talk back.
More news soon. I do have a bit. But for now, the first shortie. Many more to come. For real. Soon. Tomorrow.
#1, then:
Summer Movie Smackdown, Indie Romantic Comedy Division: (500 Days) of Summer vs. Adam:
Round One: Performances
(500 Days)
1. Two tremendously appealing leads, both sharp.
Adam
Two tremendously appealing leads, both sharp.
Round Two: Tone
(500 Days):
Pretends to bitterness, fakes sweetness.
Adam:
Mark Twain funny. That is, full of pain.
3. Use of Setting
(500 Days)
Pretty, showy shots of downtown L.A., accompanied with architectural commentary from Gordon-Levitt character meant to establish his knowledge of the discipline. Featured insights include (I’m paraphrasing, but not much) “That one’s old.”
Adam
Utterly un-flashy, eerily luminous New York. A bench in the dark in Central Park, light through grime on city windows, Grand Central (the grungy, magnificent exterior, not the stars in the ceiling), a suburban Queens street in the snow.
4. Respect for Audience
(500 Days)
Surface-clever, but includes gratuitous anti-contemporary art sequence just to make sure our would-be lovers aren’t, like, smarter than us or anything. Cuts purported bitterness with tacked-on ending.
Adam
Makes sure you know that at least one of these characters is much smarter than us, and at least one is more empathetic, and also more courageous, and maybe more clear-eyed. And no matter how it turns out, the movie never lets you forget that both of them are going to hurt.
5. Soundtrack
500 Days
Simon and Garfunkel for the key wistful bit? Really? Swear I’ve seen that done somewhere before…
Adam
Hello, the Weepies. Who are you? Welcome to the Playing Fields. You’ll find your score-mate Maria Taylor over there in the corner, where’s she’s been for a while, now. Along with most of the artists on the 500 Days soundtrack, who’ve been here a whole lot longer.
6. The Payoff
(500 Days)
spoiler alert:
I’m being harder on this movie than it deserves. Partially because it disappointed me; I was really looking forward to it. It’s pleasant enough. And the leads have both graced and will grace better films. But any movie that names our hero’s true Soulmate–the one he meets post-Summer– Autumn deserves all it gets.
Adam
In a summer of surprisingly sweet movie surprises, maybe the sweetest surprise of all. Heartfelt, hurtful, and sad, true not only to the challenges faced by people with aspergers but the people who love them.


August 9th, 2009 at 2:57 pm
I thought the message of 500 Days was more that there are many people in the world you can have a wonderful time with, and they don’t have to be the one true love of your life. So, I didn’t read Autumn as his true soul mate, but just another girl he could be compatible with. Granted, when she said her name I let out a huge groan. But I liked the movie a lot and thought it was funny. Saw the trailer for Adam when I went to see it and I definitely want to see that too.
Siena
August 9th, 2009 at 4:04 pm
A fair point, Siena–
But I still think the movie’s trying to have it both ways. In that final meeting, Summer tells him that she was wrong and he was right, that True Love is possible–just not for her with him. Therefore, the temptation, at least, is to infer that Autumn (or, perhaps, her eventual successor, Winter) will in fact be the Soulmate for our hero.
I liked the movie, too. I just hoped/expected to like it more. Great to hear from you here.
August 9th, 2009 at 7:01 pm
you had me at “Mark Twain funny.” now i must see it.